The web is quite mouse-centric. Ever tried navigating a typical website without your mouse? I'm not saying it can't be done- if you're sufficiently motivated, - but it's painful. There's nothing wrong with the point-and-click navigation model of the mouse, although it can degenerate into if you're not careful.
I don't expect web designers to create keyboard-centric websites; the mouse is a natural and intuitive enough way to navigate web sites. But so is the keyboard, in certain circumstances. What frustrates me is when web developers fail to pay attention to the most rudimentary of keyboard support in their designs.
Let's pick on eBay. Here's the eBay signin form. This form is a perfect example of keyboard navigation trumping mouse navigation.
Done right, it:. Type your user name. Press Tab to advance to the next field. Type your password. Press Enter Of course, that assumes the user knows how to use the keyboard. In my experience, this is not a safe assumption. I've seen many users, and it's not pretty.
At the risk of creating a legion of back seat drivers, I suggest that when you see coworkers users using the mouse to log in, you should gently- gently- let them know that they might be able to save some time by sticking with the keyboard for these little online forms. I'm not saying you should, but a tiny bit of keyboard expertise will serve you in good stead. This is an incredibly simple little login form. And yet there are at least three ways web developers can screw this form up for keyboard use. That's why I added the caveat done right, above.
It almost never is, and keyboard users always seem to get the shaft. To make this HTML form work properly with keyboard input, the eBay developers have to:. so I can start typing in my user ID.
Focus Internet Explorer For Mac Os High Sierra
Structure the HTML form fields so that when I press the Tab key, it advances through them in a logical order. Ensure that the HTML form submits when I press the Enter key. You might expect the tab order on the eBay login form to proceed in the same order you read the form : If so, you would be wrong. The tab order, for some unknown reason, goes directly from Password to the Sign In button, completely skipping over the 'remember me' checkbox directly under it.
This is a mild omission, to be sure. I've seen far worse, web forms with tab orders that resembled a. But tab order on a login form is so fundamental - when web developers screw up basic tab ordering on a form with four fields, that's veering dangerously close to 'I don't give a damn about my craft' territory. All the developers you know remember to test their web forms using the keyboard. But even if developers do remember to test for basic keyboard behavior, there's a deeper problem here.
Keyboard navigation relies heavily on the focus. In order to move from one area to the next, you have to be able to reliably know where you are. Unfortunately, web browsers make it needlessly difficult to tell where the focus is. Can you tell which field has the focus in Internet Explorer 7?
I think it's fair to call that incredibly subtle. Let's see how Firefox 2 does. Good luck with that. Now how about the same form in Safari 3? No wonder users rely on the mouse so much. Most browsers do an embarassingly bad job of making the focus obvious, so users feel compelled to click on fields to orient themselves.
The focus behavior is just as bad when the focus moves to the sign in button. It's technically an image masquerading as a button, but this is still a fairly common technique; it should be handled well. Internet Explorer 7 Firefox 2 Safari 3 Of the three, only Safari really gets focus right in my estimation. Here's hoping the next versions of Firefox and Internet Explorer copy this more obvious focus indicator. If users can orient themselves using a clear, unambiguous focus, they're a lot more likely to warm up to a little.
Embed this Program Add this Program to your website by copying the code below. Preview Preview. No longer works properly on Mac Microsoft ended support for Internet Explorer for Mac on December 31st, 2005, and does not provide further security or performance updates. Since the browser is no longer designed to handle the requirements of most modern web pages, we strongly advise you to try, or instead. Alternatively, just check out all of the available for Mac. Totally unusable - only for nostalgia However, if you really can't help yourself and are an Internet Explorer nostalgic, you might want to try it for a trip down memory lane.
However, for normal internet browsing we'd really discourage you from using it. We couldn't even render the Softonic website in it and indeed, most websites failed to load properly. Internet Explorer for Mac is incredibly slow, buggy, prone to crashes and freezing and is woefully short of security settings. Since development finished in 2005, Internet Explorer for Mac doesn't offer even the most basic features that you would consider a prerequisite on any browser nowadays like tabs, extensions, saved sessions or private data management. This latest version — version 5.2.3 — enhances browser compatibility for users who work on a network with secure authentication or with proxy servers.
Free Internet Explorer For Mac
It also provides all the latest security and performance enhancements for Internet Explorer 5 for Mac OS X. Changes. This latest version — version 5.2.3 — enhances browser compatibility for users who work on a network with secure authentication or with proxy servers.
It also provides all the latest security and performance enhancements for Internet Explorer 5 for Mac OS X. By Anonymous Not compatible with new Macs. Internet Explorer used to be pretty good browser for Windows. In my opinion Mac users do not need it. Def ault OS X browser is almost perfect.
If you are looking for the alternative to Safari - Google Chrome may be a good choice. I have downloaded IE just to make sure that it is useless. It did not work on my Mac. It is not compatible with Intel based machine so it can be used on old Macs only.
Cons: not compatible with new Macs reviewed on May 14, 2015.
Tested on Using safari: when the address bar has the focus, pressing tab moves focus to the first input field but it does not receive focus styling. Pressing alt+tab moves focus to the last input field but it does not receive focus styling. Using chrome: when the address bar has the focus, pressing alt+tab moves focus to the last input field but it does not receive focus styling. In both cases, if I press shift after navigating, it does add the styling. I assume there's a problem with catching the keyboard events from outside the web content? Actually, in the case of Chrome and reverse-tabbing to the last element in the page - as it's an - this does apply.
Although the onFocus function is triggered when the input receives focus, the keyboard event happened in the UI, so hadKeyboardEvent is false at that point, and a file type of input is not in the whitelist, and the if (hadKeyboardEvent focusTriggersKeyboardModality(e.target)) evaluates to false. So that's why when SHIFT+TABbing from address bar to that file chooser the focus is not applied. I've just tested this behavior even more extensively to include Firefox for Mac and Chrome on Windows and ugh more inconsistencies:. Firefox on Mac exhibits the same aforementioned 'bug' in Safari and Chrome: no keydown event is fired when navigating from the location bar into the document via the Tab key. This leads me to believe this behavior is rooted in the windowing environment on the Mac, and as such, perhaps is something somehow intentional?.
Chrome on Windows (surprisingly) behaves as it does on the Mac, with the same 'bug.' So, here's the complete breakdown: Browsers that do fire keydown in advance of initial focus into the document:. IE. Firefox for Windows Browsers that do not fire keydown in advance of initial focus into the document:. Chrome for Mac and Windows.
Firefox for Mac. Safari Given all of these findings I'm wondering if you could do some more investigation on your end with the Chrome team regarding reason behind differences. For example: is Chrome doing something special to be consistent cross platform?
Does the Chrome team have a hunch as to why this bug would exist consistently across all browsers on the Mac? Conceptually, i'm tending more towards the idea that IE/Firefox(Win) are a bit strange in this respect compared to the other browsers. The keypress clearly happened in the UI, not the document itself, so it's strange that they'd send a keydown to the document when that happened outside of the document (too lazy to test, but I'm assuming they're special-casing keypresses that resulted in getting into the document, and that they're not firing events for any arbitrary keystrokes that happened anywhere else in the UI). So i'm wondering if the approach in the polyfill needs to be extended (perhaps keeping track Document.hasFocus which i'm presuming would be false when the user's in the UI)? Agreed, it would be great if the focus event indicated its source.
However, I can't see that being standardised in any timely manner. I agree that it would be weird to send a keypress event for a keypress which happened outside of web contents, but I think an argument could be made for it in this case. In fact, I think it would work well with any eventual API to explain a focus event - a relatedEvent (like relatedTarget) would be more useful and flexible than a string/enum, and would require the keyboard event to exist. Another way to mitigate this issue (though admittedly not resolving it), is to combine the keyboard and mouse events detection along with special behavior for the first and last focusable elements on the pages. We just merged which means we are no longer attempting to match.focus-ring if someone moves focus programmatically.
Instead it only matches if the user moved by pressing the Tab or Shift-Tab keys. I think programmatic focus was the only thing holding back ' suggestion in. I consider this a pretty severe bug since someone relying on a keyboard is basically guaranteed to hit it. So I'd like to explore if we can create something along the lines of proposed solution that still feels like an accurate:focus-ring polyfill.
AddEventListener( 'mousemove ', onInitialPointerMove); document. AddEventListener( 'mousedown ', onInitialPointerMove); document. AddEventListener( 'mouseup ', onInitialPointerMove); document. AddEventListener( 'pointermove ', onInitialPointerMove); document. AddEventListener( 'pointerdown ', onInitialPointerMove); document.
AddEventListener( 'pointerup ', onInitialPointerMove); document. AddEventListener( 'touchmove ', onInitialPointerMove); document. AddEventListener( 'touchstart ', onInitialPointerMove); document. AddEventListener( 'touchend ', onInitialPointerMove); Hearing any of those events will change hasKeyboardEvent to false, and also remove all of the event listeners. My thinking is that we might not be able to listen to keydown but there's a good chance we'll be able to hear a mousemove or something like that before the user clicks/focuses something.
When the window is blurred I restore the initialPointerMove listeners. This is to account for situations where you switch tabs and then come back. I'm not entirely sure if I need to do this but I figured I'd include it just in case. Tested this today on Windows in Chrome, Firefox, Edge, and Internet Explorer 11.
My test file has a skip link at the top that should appear only when it has focus, and when the page is loaded, focus is set via JS on the first navigation item (about). Expected results: When page loads focus is set on the about link but cannot be seen. When tab is pressed, focus should move to the 'contact' link and be visible with a blue border. Results: Windows 10. Firefox 15: works as expected. Chome 61: works as expected. Edge 40: focus is set on 'about' but the next tab press causes focus to jump out of the webpage and to the browser itself.
If I remove the setting of initial focus on the 'about' link it works as expected. This seems to be an issue with Edge though and not focus-ring.js. Internet Explorer 11: works as expected Mac 10.12. Firefox 56: works as expected. Chrome 61: works as expected. Safari 11: works as expected.
There are very few projects on which arch-rivals, Microsoft and Apple have worked together. One of those rare occasions was the development of Internet Explorer for use on Mac OS X based computers. About Internet Explorer's Mac Version As old Mac loyalists will remember, Internet Explorer's Mac version was specially developed by Microsoft for its rival operating system platform. As part of the deal made between Microsoft and Apple Computers in 1997, Internet Explorer (IE) was released as the default browser for Mac OS and Mac OS X, from 1998 till 2003, when it was supplanted by Apple's own web browser, named Safari, which Mac users must already be familiar with. Though the initial version of IE for Mac was developed from architecture, which is similar to its Windows equivalent, the later versions were developed differently. Microsoft developed the Tasman layout engine specially for the Mac- Version 5.
It had the best support at that time for web standards like HTML (Hypertext Markup Language) and CSS (Cascaded Style Sheets) After the end of the agreement with Apple in 2003, Microsoft officially announced that it was ceasing further development of Internet Explorer for the Macintosh platform. Still support for the last released version (IE 5 Macintosh Edition) continued until the end of 2005. Now the Microsoft website no longer provides a download of the program setup files. Unique Features There were many unique features in Internet Explorer developed for Mac.
Here is a list of the prime features that were endemic to this web browser. These features refer to the last stable version released by Microsoft.
It had support for Chinese script and Japanese Kanji. There was an archive feature which let the user preserve a web page, as it is.
A separate built-in auction manager that tracked eBay auctions for a user was useful. Support for PNG format was a new feature at the time of release. There was a print preview functionality that allowed font size adjustment from preview window. Its Tasman based rendering engine did a better job of supporting CSS than the Windows version. You could zoom in to resize text on any page. The auto complete function in the browser address bar was useful.
How to Download the Mac Version If you are a Mac user, who is still nostalgic about the Microsoft Internet Explorer's Mac version, you can still get its set up and install it on your Mac. Then there may be some of you who are compelled to use the Mac version for software development purpose. All you need to do is search on the Google search engine with the phrase ' Internet Explorer For Mac Download'.
You will get search results from web sites like Softpedia and Softonic. You can download the last stable version through such sites and use it. Using Latest Versions on Mac OS X One of the simplest ways of using Internet Explorer's recent versions, including IE 7, 8 and 9 is through virtualization software like VirtualBox, which lets you run another operating system and its native programs on your existing operating system platform. It can be used to run Windows XP, Windows Vista or Windows 7 on your Mac OS X. This is the most bug-free way of using Internet Explorer on Mac OS X, for developers who need to test their applications on the Microsoft developed browser. One can still have the last release of Internet Explorer, designed for Mac, but it's not really recommended, as better web browsers have been developed today that surpass it.
There are new web browsers like Mozilla Firefox and the recently developed Google Chrome that offer an excellent web browsing experience. People facing problems with the browser, are already migrating to these new browsers. Apple's own Safari web browser is well suited for use on any Macintosh system.